No fellow for mixing? (4,4)
I believe the answer is:
lone wolf
'mixing?' is the definition.
Both the definition and answer are singular nouns.
Maybe they are linked in a way I don't understand?
'no fellow' is the wordplay.
'no fellow' anagrams to 'LONE WOLF'.
However, I'm not sure how this is indicated.
'for' acts as a link.
Can you help me to learn more?
(Other definitions for lone wolf that I've seen before include "independent type" , "Solitary type" , "Independent operator" , "Person who prefers solitude" , "recluse" .)