Poor-quality (3)
<span class="explanation-format__ClueExplanation">I believe this clue is a double definition.<br/ ><br/ >'<span class="explanation-format__original">poor</span>' is the first definition.<br/ ><span class="explanation-format__explanation">(similar in meaning)</span><br/ ><br/ >'<span class="explanation-format__original">quality</span>' is the second definition.<br/ ><span class="explanation-format__explanation">(bad is a kind of quality)</span><br/ ><br/ ></span>
(Other definitions for bad that I've seen before include "Evil, below standard or off" , "Severe; of low standard" , "Mouldy, off" , "Spoiled or evil" , "Rotten, evil" .)
(Other definitions for third-rate that I've seen before include "Very inderior in quality - do a count" , "Very inferior in quality, using ordinal number" , "Of very poor quality" , "Very inferior in numerical way" , "Very inferior in quality in numeric description" .)